Philosophy and failure

Given that few philosophers (of those generally considered 'great') actually manage to answer fundamental the questions they pose, of what value is philosophy? Perhaps even more interesting: how can a philosopher considered to be wrong on most issues be regarded as one of greatness? Scott F. Aikin and Robert B. Talisse confront the question, and conclude:

Having the insight to grasp a deep and foreboding philosophical problem, and fortitude to devote one’s life to addressing it unflinchingly is a mark of philosophical greatness. It is a mark of intellectual respect to subject the efforts of great philosophers to unrelenting criticism. By doing so, we do our part in enabling the next attempt.

Read their full piece. Of course, this is no departure from the precedent established by earlier philosophical posts: it's not the sort of light reading material you reach for after prolonged mental activity, but it's well worth your time nonetheless.